Risk to Benefit. Is it worth it?

“Can I go back to playing [insert sport or activity] yet?”

In physiotherapy and sports medicine, this is one of the most common questions we get asked. And at it’s most fundamental, it’s a question about risk to benefit.

The athlete wants to go back the the activity she enjoys. She wants to hit the field, return to sport and get back to her team.

Unfortunately the answer to that question, as always, is: it depends.

It’s very seldom a straight yes or no. There are often many individual and situational variables to consider when assessing risk to benefit for return to sport or activity.

These include:

  • What type of injury did the athlete suffer?
  • What was the severity of the injury?
  • How long has she been injured and how is the injury progressing?
  • How long has she been doing her injury rehabilitation?
  • What type of rehab has she been doing? Is it passive? Active? Both?
  • What type of sport does she participate in?
  • What level does she play at?
  • What intensity will she be going back?
  • Is her fitness level adequate or has the layoff led to a loss of sport conditioning?
  • Can she gradually ramp back up to normal levels? Or will she be going back in all out, right away?

These are just a few of some of the questions that should be taken into consideration for safe return to sport – a return where risk to benefit is  heavily skewed towards the benefit side of the equation.

Any physiotherapist or sports medicine practitioner who has been involved in the industry for any length of time will have learned early on that many athletes will return to sport with or without our blessings. This is often more prevalent in a competitive realm where being seen or performing consistently may have an impact on future opportunities (e.g. playing in front of college or university scouts, rep team tryouts etc).

So then the important part comes down to making sure that our athlete is clearly informed about what becomes the biggest consideration for a safer return to activity: risk to benefit.

Is the risk of returning to sport early worth the potential benefit?

One of the biggest educational items we work on with our athletes is to let them know the major possible risks and let them compare those risks to the potential benefits of returning to sport.

It’s that same risk to benefit consideration that keeps popping up.

Having knowledge of her particular risk to benefit ratio will give the athlete the power to make the informed decision for herself as to whether or not the risks of returning to play (e.g. re-injury) are worth the benefits (e.g. exposure in front of scouts).

Or if it would be a better option for her to hold off for a little while longer until her risk drops and the benefit increases.

If you’ve been injured and you’re wondering if the risk to benefit in your specific case is worth it, get in touch with us. We can help you make an informed decision.

Is walking considered the best exercise?

An oft repeated, and overheard, expression suggests that walking is the best exercise.

And people want to know.

Is it true?

Is walking really considered the best exercise?

Does is rank higher than squats? Push ups? Or any of those fancy machines at the gym?

Does is do better for your body than running hills or pushing yourself through grueling marathons?

Or are the health and fitness benefits of walking being overblown and shown out of proportion from the reality?

The truth, as is almost always the case with these types of questions is, it depends.

It will depend on your current level of fitness and your current health status.

As a physiotherapist, I see people who come in varying states of de-conditioning, disease or injury healing.

For some of these people, a short walk may be an extreme challenge, zapping massive amounts of energy and requiring tremendous physical resources. A few slow steps may necessitate a 10 minute rest before the next attempt. The heart and lungs screaming, sweat dripping down the brow. This would be considered exercise.

As a physiotherapist, I also see people who come in with excellent baseline fitness levels and no active injuries. In their cases, walking would be considered a physical activity (Non-Exercise Physical Activity, or NEPA) but not exercise in the traditional sense. In order for them to be challenged by walking it would likely have to be over rugged terrain, over long durations, and at higher speeds.

Now that we’ve established that walking can be both considered, and not considered, exercise based on individual background, is it the best?

This gets even trickier.

What does “the best” even mean?

I propose that the best exercise is the one that you’re able to do consistently over time at a sufficient intensity that challenges you and moves you towards your goals.

If you’re sick, ill, or out of shape, then walking may be the best exercise for you at that time.

If you’re healthy and fit, then walking, while offering all sorts of associated physical and mental benefits, may not be the best exercise for you. It’s likely too easy for you in your present state.

So to reiterate, it all depends on where you’re starting.

And if you need some professional help finding out where you stand and what exercise is best for you, feel free to get in touch with us.